Bill to give juvenile lifers a second chance SB 9 Fails

Marisa Lagos, Chronicle Staff Writer

For the second time in as many years, the state Assembly defeated a bill today that would have offered some juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison the opportunity for release – a measure that was adamantly opposed by Republicans and victims’ rights groups.

The bill’s failure followed more than an hour of contentious debate and several rounds of voting in the lower house, and came despite intense lobbying by Democrats backing the measure, including Speaker John Pérez, D-Los Angeles. At one point after coming within one vote of passing, several Democrats pulled back their support, and SB9 ultimately failed by five votes, 36-36.

A spokesman for Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, who authored the bill, said supporters will likely bring the measure up for reconsideration before the Legislature’s session ends Sept. 9.

The bill would give inmates who committed a crime as a minor and were sentenced to life without the possibility of parole the hope for eventual release. Under SB9, an offender who has been in prison for at least 15 years, has worked toward rehabilitation and can prove they are remorseful could ask the court to reduce their sentence. If the court agrees, the inmate would receive a new sentence of 25-years to life in prison, and after serving at least 25 years, could appeal to the state’s parole board for release.

About 295 California inmates are serving juvenile life without parole sentences- though backers do not think the majority would meet the bill’s requirements for securing a new sentence, and note that even if they did, there is no guarantee the parole board will let them out. Supporters have focused on the approximately 45 percent of those inmates that were convicted under California’s aiding and abetting law, which allows for a first degree murder conviction of accomplices. They cite cases such as that of 30-year-old Christian Bracamontes, who at the age of 16 was with a friend who shot and killed another teen during a marijuana robbery in Riverside County. Bracamontes is serving life without parole, while the shooter struck a deal with prosecutors and was sentenced to 29-years to life.

Assemblyman Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, who carried the bill in the lower house, said the measure is a “simple matter.”

“You either believe in redemption or you don’t,” he said. “This bill asks the question, ‘Are you are the same person that you were 25 years ago?’ It asks the question, ‘Are you perfect, or are you a better person than you were 25 years ago? It asks the question, ‘Have you ever made a mistake, and have you ever learned from that mistake?'”

Cedillo said members who believe in a human’s ability to change should not have a problem supporting the bill; and he and other supporters cited research showing that adolescent brains are still developing.

Continue Reading @ SF Gate


3 thoughts on “Bill to give juvenile lifers a second chance SB 9 Fails

  1. One inaccuracy in that article. Inmates who are serving 25 to Life are eligible for parole after they have completed 80% of the minimum of their sentence. In this case it’s after 20 years of time served.
    Congressman Yee will always have my vote for bringing two different Senate Bills to the table, even if they were both shot down. I hope he brings another one like this in the future. When reading something like this, it really shows me that we still are on the ground floor when it comes to correction and rehabilitation. How many more inmate lives will be subject to politics and this failed theory that “tough on crime” is a deterrent? How much longer can a slanted concept of the punishment fitting the crime be bedfellows with monetary gain exist? When will tax payers realize that prisons are now businesses and are both enacted at the state and private level?
    But lets call a spade a spade… Crime pays. Just ask the bankers floating bonds to contractors to build prisons instead of schools, libraries, or parks. Something is wrong when a warehouse for victims of circumstance makes way more money than structures that benefit society. Also ask the CCPOA who need more prisons to expand their influence and political arm- and don’t forget about the ones subjugated to unfair sentencing, inhumane treatment, and will live the life of a caged animal in order for this sick business model to exist too.
    Fuck you California- we are supposed to be the progressive state in this patchwork of democracy. What are you afraid of? That someone who has served time might actually be released? Or maybe its that you know as well as anyone that the CDCR neither corrects nor rehabilitates.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s